Vietnam's plastic consumption was growing 10% annually, but innovation support focused downstream on waste management.
.jpg)
How We Mapped Vietnam's First Upstream Innovation Landscape
Vietnam's economic boom brought explosive plastic consumption—growing 10% year-on-year with no signs of slowing. The response was predictable: more recycling facilities, better collection systems, improved waste processing. Everyone focused downstream on managing plastic after it became waste.
But no one was systematically studying how to prevent plastic waste at the source through upstream innovation: reusable systems, alternative materials, elimination of unnecessary packaging. Without understanding who was working on upstream solutions or what support they needed, the ecosystem couldn't effectively help innovators succeed.
The Challenge When we began this research in partnership with ICM Falk Foundation, Vietnam's innovation ecosystem had a fundamental blind spot. Investors didn't know where to deploy capital in upstream solutions. Universities ran generic startup competitions that missed what circular economy entrepreneurs actually needed. Incubators offered one-size-fits-all programs designed for tech startups, not biomaterials innovators or reuse system developers.
Meanwhile, upstream innovations face unique challenges that conventional startup support doesn't address: green premiums that make price competition difficult, reverse logistics complexity, need for specialized technical expertise, requirement for patient capital during longer development cycles.
The ecosystem was growing—but growing blind.
Why We Were Positioned to Lead This Research Since 2016, Evergreen Labs had been building upstream solutions across Southeast Asia. We understood from direct experience what upstream innovators actually need versus what support systems typically offer. We had relationships with innovators, universities, funders, and policy makers across Vietnam's emerging ecosystem.
Most importantly, we approached the research not as academic observers, but as practitioners who needed this ecosystem to work better. Our own ventures—ReForm Plastic, Glassia Water, HealthyFarm—had navigated these same challenges. We knew what questions to ask because we'd lived the problems.
Mapping the Invisible Ecosystem Our approach was comprehensive: map every upstream solution we could find, understand what innovators actually needed through in-depth interviews, identify all ecosystem stakeholders, and analyze gaps between needs and available support.
Solution Mapping: We identified 45 upstream solutions across three categories: elimination (reducing unnecessary packaging), reuse/refill systems (circular packaging models), and material circulation (biodegradable alternatives, agricultural waste utilization).
Innovator Interviews: Instead of surveying what support organizations thought innovators needed, we conducted detailed interviews with entrepreneurs to understand their real challenges, resource gaps, and success factors.
Stakeholder Analysis: We mapped 70 ecosystem participants including universities, incubators, accelerators, investors, competitions, NGOs, and government agencies—documenting what each offered and how they connected (or failed to connect) with others.
Gap Analysis: We compared what innovators needed with what support systems provided, identifying specific mismatches that prevented promising solutions from scaling successfully.
What We Discovered The research revealed an ecosystem with significant potential but fundamental misalignment between innovator needs and available support:
Solution Distribution: 71% focused on material substitution (biodegradable alternatives from agricultural waste), only 18% on reuse/refill models despite lower barriers to entry. Most solutions (41%) were in early ideation/launch stages.
Funding Reality: 74% of funding came from one-time competition prizes without follow-on support. Innovators needed patient capital and blended financing, but found mostly traditional VC models or pure grant funding.
Support Mismatch: Generic startup programs didn't address upstream innovation's unique needs: technical expertise in biomaterials and circular systems, industry connections for commercialization, specialized mentorship for supply chain complexity.
Ecosystem Fragmentation: Universities, incubators, and funders operated independently without collaboration or knowledge sharing. Promising innovators fell through gaps between programs.
Beyond Individual Recommendations What makes this research particularly significant is how it created Vietnam's first shared understanding of the upstream innovation landscape. Before this study, each stakeholder operated with partial information. Now they have comprehensive mapping that enables coordinated support.
The white paper became a reference document for organizations designing upstream-focused programs, funders considering circular economy investments, and policy makers understanding how to enable innovation that prevents waste rather than just managing it.