Vietnam produces 156.8 million tonnes of agricultural waste annually, but lacks infrastructure to transform it into commercial plastic alternatives.

How We Built Infrastructure for University Innovation to Become Market Reality
Vietnam produces 156.8 million tonnes of agricultural byproducts annually—worth $5 billion. Yet only $275 million of that value is captured. Most agricultural waste gets burned, landfilled, or composted when it could be transformed into alternatives to single-use plastic.
Universities across Vietnam had talented students researching innovative materials from cassava starch, bamboo, coconut shells, and other abundant local resources. But these innovations rarely made it beyond lab prototypes. The gap between university research and commercial viability was preventing breakthrough solutions from reaching the market.
The Challenge When we began investigating Vietnam's materials innovation landscape in 2023, the pattern was consistent across universities. Students developed promising alternatives to plastic using local agricultural waste. Faculty supported their research. But innovations stalled at the prototype stage because the commercialization infrastructure simply didn't exist.
Students had technical skills but no business mentorship or market knowledge. Research budgets covered discovery but not the iterative testing needed for commercial viability. Universities lacked relationships with manufacturers who could test formulations at scale. No one was validating whether these materials could actually compete with plastic on price and performance.
Why We Were Positioned to Build This Bridge Through our work across circular economy ventures since 2016, Evergreen Labs understood both the market demand for plastic alternatives and the challenges of bringing new materials to commercial scale.
ICM Falk Foundation and Evergreen Labs designed the Materials Lab Pilot as a structured test: could the right collaboration framework bridge university research to commercial viability?
Framework Design: Instead of typical university competitions offering one-time prize money, we created an open innovation model with fair compensation, hybrid work arrangements (physical lab plus remote research), clear development phases, and transparent intellectual property outcomes.
Material Selection: We chose two cassava-based materials that had shown commercial potential in previous programs: nursery bags for agriculture (dry application needing minimal water absorption) and edible/dissolvable film for food packaging (wet application needing maximal water absorption).
Technical Process: Structured improvement cycles including scientific literature review, baseline testing at external lab, experimentation planning, multiple rounds of formulation improvements, and final validation testing.
Market Research: Parallel analysis of competitor landscape, patent research, application field mapping, and commercial viability assessment to ensure technical improvements addressed real market opportunities.
What We Discovered The 3-month pilot (February-May 2023) proved that structured collaboration could bridge the university-market gap while revealing what additional support was needed for full commercialization:
Technical Achievements: Both materials showed significant mechanical improvements through iterative testing.
Market Insights: Vietnam's plastic alternative market is nascent with limited competition, narrowly focused on F&B applications while overlooking agriculture and other sectors, and open for innovation with minimal patents indicating opportunity for new entrants.
Framework Validation: small-scale initiatives proved efficient ($15-20K over 3 months); the timeframe delivered measurable results; university partnerships unlocked significant talent pools; fair compensation created sustainable engagement versus competition-based models.
The Honest Reality: water absorption remained too high for Material #1 to be practical in humid climate; food safety regulatory questions remained for Material #2; both materials needed more R&D before competing commercially with plastic; cost calculations needed validation with actual manufacturers; input source reliability not yet confirmed; no testing in commercial production settings; certifications not obtained. Formulations improved significantly but weren't market-ready.
What This Represents This pilot demonstrates that university innovation can become market reality when supported by proper infrastructure connecting technical development, market research, and commercialization expertise. Vietnamese students were ready to develop breakthrough materials—they just needed structured pathways from lab to market.